# <a id="appendix-12-language-and-perspective-taking" href="https://globway.top/s/appendix-12-language-and-perspective-taking">appendix 12: language and perspective taking (scratch; draft)</a>
perspective, view, stance, cf. gesture cf. anticipation cf. "​"​"​"​"​"belief, beliefs"​"​"​"​" cf. "​"​"​"​"​"model, models"​"​"​"​"
Bob \[in X circumstance] WOULD think feel say that “but then the words/​concepts aren’t subscripted, so…” still in originator concepts..
the dog ran
Bob’s the bob’s dog bob’s ran
Bob would say that a dog, which is for him a form of…
Bob thinks (which for him is a strange tacit knowing) that dogs (which for him are…) pivot (which for him is////means…) across X (which for him is…); Bob thinks that dogs pivot across X.
\*
* I can see someone.
* Someone can see me.
* Someone can see us (and I might not necessarily see them).
* Someone can see that person seeing us.
* "An integral calculus of primordial perspectives" in Excerpt C: the ways were are in this together (of Kosmos Trilogy 2, unpublished) by Ken Wilber
* Appendix II: integral post-metaphysics \["gigagloss"] in Wilber, Ken. Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Shambhala Publications, 2007.
* Wilber, Ken. The religion of tomorrow: a vision for the future of the great traditions-more inclusive, more comprehensive, more complete. Shambhala Publications, 2017.
* Cook-Greuter, Susanne Regina. Postautonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Harvard University, 1999.
* Cook-Greuter, Susanne R. "Ego development: Nine levels of increasing embrace." Unpublished manuscript (2005).
* An Integral Map of Perspective-Taking (appendix included version) by Clint Fuhs; Fuhs, Clint. "An integral map of perspective-taking." Integral theory in action (2010): 273-302.
* Guskin, Harold. How to stop acting. Macmillan, 2003.
* Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. "Deep and surface anaphora." Linguistic inquiry 7.3 (1976): 391-428.
* The Transpersonal Actor: Reinterpreting Stanislavski by Ned Manderino. 1989.
Bob [in X circumstance] WOULD think feel say that “but then the words/concepts aren’t subscripted, so…” still in originator concepts..
the dog ran
Bob’s the bob’s dog bob’s ran
Bob would say that a dog, which is for him a form of…
Bob thinks (which for him is a strange tacit knowing) that dogs (which for him are…) pivot (which for him is////means…) across X (which for him is…); Bob thinks that dogs pivot across X.
*
I can see someone.
Someone can see me.
Someone can see us (and I might not necessarily see them).
Someone can see that person seeing us.
"An integral calculus of primordial perspectives" in Excerpt C: the ways were are in this together (of Kosmos Trilogy 2, unpublished) by Ken Wilber
Appendix II: integral post-metaphysics ["gigagloss"] in Wilber, Ken. Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Shambhala Publications, 2007.
Wilber, Ken. The religion of tomorrow: a vision for the future of the great traditions-more inclusive, more comprehensive, more complete. Shambhala Publications, 2017.
Cook-Greuter, Susanne Regina. Postautonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Harvard University, 1999.
Cook-Greuter, Susanne R. "Ego development: Nine levels of increasing embrace." Unpublished manuscript (2005).
An Integral Map of Perspective-Taking (appendix included version) by Clint Fuhs; Fuhs, Clint. "An integral map of perspective-taking." Integral theory in action (2010): 273-302.
Guskin, Harold. How to stop acting. Macmillan, 2003.
Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. "Deep and surface anaphora." Linguistic inquiry 7.3 (1976): 391-428.
The Transpersonal Actor: Reinterpreting Stanislavski by Ned Manderino. 1989.
280 words · appendix · last upstream edit 2023-11-13